History

1. 1.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Distinguish a longer-term cause and a short-term pressure in the fictional episode.

   [2 marks] · no calculator
2. 2.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Explain the main difference between interpretations A and B.

   [2 marks] · no calculator
3. 3.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Explain how the coalition's earlier promise affects interpretation A.

   [3 marks] · no calculator
4. 4.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Explain what evidence would test the counterfactual 'without the strike, the law would still have passed'.

   [3 marks] · no calculator
5. 5.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Assess whether A and B can be combined into a stronger explanation.

   [4 marks] · no calculator
6. 6.

   Entirely fictional reform episode and interpretations for skills practice. In the invented state of Vale, a 1920 housing law followed years of campaigning, a costly strike and a new governing coalition. The coalition had promised reform before the strike. Invented interpretation A: 'The strike forced the law.' Invented interpretation B: 'The coalition made the law possible.' Neither interpretation is attributed to a real historian; no claims about a real 1920 law are intended. Assess how you would judge the housing law's historical significance without assuming passage meant success.

   [4 marks] · no calculator

Original, unofficial practice questions from SubjectScout — not official past-paper questions.