Psychology: Cambridge 2027 syllabus mapping
Cambridge International AS & A Level 9990 · Examination year 2027
AI-assisted conceptual placements, not official Cambridge endorsement or independent teacher approval. A linked practice question does not establish complete teaching, practical competence or exam readiness.
- Current question placements
- 95 / 95
- Direct conceptual matches
- 28
- Partial matches
- 44
- Enrichment
- 23
- Placements needing review
- 0
- Inventory entries without linked practice
- 72
Inventory scope: specified content sections. Source inventory: recorded in full at this scope. Independent teacher approval: pending.
Official references
- Psychology 9990 syllabus 2027 · 1, September 2024; change statement PDF p61 · checked 2026-10-24
- Psychology 9990 Reference List: AS and A Level Studies · 1, September 2024 · checked 2026-10-24
- Holzel et al. (2011), original author manuscript · 191(1), 36-43; methods 2.1/2.4 and results 3.3 inspected · checked 2026-10-24
- Andrade (2010), What does doodling do? · Plymouth author manuscript; 17-page repository PDF; methods pp5-7, results pp8-9, discussion pp9-12 · checked 2026-10-24
- Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961), original article transcription · York University archive; original journal pp575-582 · checked 2026-10-24
- Milgram (1963), Behavioral study of obedience · Original journal pp371-378; 8-page PDF · checked 2026-10-24
Practice by syllabus reference
AS · Core (29 entries)
A · Core (8 entries)
| Reference | Concept | Linked practice |
|---|---|---|
| A Level issues and debates | Applying option debates | |
| 3.2 A Level Content / Experiments | Randomised controlled trials | |
| 3.2 A Level Content / Questionnaires | Postal reports and rating formats | |
| 3.2 A Level Content / Psychometric tests | Psychometric measurement | |
| 3.2 A Level Content / Hypotheses | Option hypothesis formulation | |
| 3.2 A Level Content / Validity | Temporal validity | |
| Use of studies | Key versus example studies | |
| Planning studies for Paper 4 | Option investigation planning |
A · Specialist Option 1: Clinical Psychology (20 entries)
A · Specialist Option 2: Consumer Psychology (20 entries)
A · Specialist Option 3: Health Psychology (20 entries)
A · Specialist Option 4: Organisational Psychology (20 entries)
Remaining academic requirements
- Conceptual alignment only, never certification or teacher approval. Every placement has teacherApproved:false. Mapped means the item directly exercises some stated content, not mastery of its entire section or assessment objective.
- Inventory scope is content_sections: printed numbered content subsections plus explicitly located unnumbered psychology headings/studies. Nested teaching bullets and every individual leaf learning outcome are not separately enumerated; inventoryComplete refers only to this declared section scope, not complete leaf outcomes or teaching coverage.
- New questions are original English-only indicative practice with distinct marking points, not Cambridge past papers, official mark allocations or teacher-reviewed material. No exam-entry option, two-option choice or whole-syllabus completion is inferred. Parent integration and revision hashing remain necessary.
- Read9990 official2027 syllabus pp14-54 and p61 change statement; all30 PDF pages of its version1 Reference List inspected, including distinctions and worked guidance. Official overview linked no separate2027 update notice; the applicable change statement says no significant teaching changes. Later2028-2030 materials were not substituted.
- Inventory includes12 compulsory AS core studies,15 unnumbered research-method headings, A-level methodological/debate headings, all60 numbered subtopics across all4 specialist options, all20 mandatory option key-study references and planning requirements. This is not an inventory of every nested concept/example-study bullet. Students select2 options; none is selected on their behalf.
- New primary-source study tasks inspect Holzel methods/results, Andrade's 17-page author manuscript (methods PDF pp5-7, results pp8-9, discussion pp9-12), Bandura's archived original text and Milgram's 8-page original paper (methods PDF pp2-4, results pp5-6). They cover selected evidence/limits only: none is a full detailed core-study account. Some initial university mirrors failed; the retained public sources were accessible and no paywall was bypassed.
- Still lacks detailed coverage of Dement/Kleitman, Hassett, Baron-Cohen, Pozzulo, Fagen, Saavedra/Silverman, Perry and Piliavin (all8 remain required). The4 newly sampled core studies also need complete background, sample, procedure, quantitative/qualitative results, evaluation and comparisons. All20 option key studies remain without full study-specific question sets; general option applications do not substitute for their evidence.
- Reference Listp16 explicitly notes the Oruc bipolar sample while explaining placement under unipolar explanations; do not silently relabel participants as unipolar. Its broad generalisation/biological wording needs critical teacher discussion, not rote adoption as scientific certainty. Clinical diagnostic/treatment detail must use appropriate ICD-11 context and qualified source review; no diagnosis or treatment instruction is provided here.
- Specific remaining content includes animal-study evidence and child safeguards; full self-report/case-study planning; continuous descriptive graph practice; all disorder-specific diagnostic criteria and competing treatments; consumer atmospherics/heuristics/advertising models; health pain/stress/promotion models; work leadership/team/conflict/satisfaction frameworks. Paper2 planning features and Paper4 planning features differ (pp51/53); these short questions are not full assessed plans.
- Syllabusp23 excludes calculations/statistical tests beyond the stated descriptive content. Sign-test, effect-size and p-value exercises are enrichment, not required9990 content. Attachment, Asch-style conformity, working-memory component and language-lesion questions are not forced into this specific2027 core-study list. Independent subject-teacher approval and option-specific assessment validation remain outstanding.