Biology SL
Habitats and Abiotic Tolerance
- 1.
Marram grass lives on exposed sand dunes. Explain how a rolled leaf, hairs inside the rolled surface and sunken stomata can reduce water loss in this habitat.
[4 marks] · no calculatorWorked explanation
- Link the exposed, freely draining habitat to the risk of losing water faster than roots replace it.
- Rolling, hairs and recessed pores shelter air next to the stomata, reducing removal of water vapour.
- The more humid boundary layer reduces the vapour gradient; these structures reduce rather than abolish transpiration.
Common mistake: Saying hairs absorb all the water needed misses their role in sheltering the humid air near stomata.
Marking points
- Exposed dunes experience wind and limited available water, favouring water conservation.
- Rolling shelters the stomatal surface from moving air.
- Hairs and sunken stomata retain a humid boundary layer near the pores.
- Higher local humidity reduces the water-vapour concentration gradient and therefore transpiration.
Examiner tip: Saying hairs absorb all the water needed misses their role in sheltering the humid air near stomata.
- 2.
A mangrove grows in waterlogged sediment with little oxygen. Some roots project above the sediment and have gas-permeable regions exposed at low tide. Explain how these features benefit living root cells and why submerged roots may still be oxygen-limited.
[4 marks] · no calculatorWorked explanation
- Abundant water does not imply abundant oxygen available to root cells.
- The projecting roots provide an air-entry route and internal aeration supports ATP production by aerobic respiration.
- At high tide the air-entry route may be covered, so the adaptation does not guarantee unlimited oxygen supply.
Common mistake: Do not say roots photosynthesise to obtain oxygen; this task concerns gas entry and transport to respiring cells.
Marking points
- Waterlogging restricts oxygen supply through the sediment.
- Exposed gas-permeable root regions allow oxygen to enter from air.
- Internal air spaces can conduct oxygen towards living submerged root tissues for aerobic respiration.
- When submerged, access to air is restricted and oxygen diffusion through water is relatively slow.
Examiner tip: Do not say roots photosynthesise to obtain oxygen; this task concerns gas entry and transport to respiring cells.
- 3.
Hypothetical equal-age seedlings are grown for 14 days at soil salinities of 0, 5, 10 and 20 g dm^-3. Mean dry-mass gains are 0.8, 1.2, 0.6 and 0.0 g respectively. Other conditions are matched. Identify the best tested salinity, describe the supported tolerance pattern and explain why these results cannot establish the species' exact natural distribution.
[4 marks] · no calculatorWorked explanation
- Compare the four means rather than assuming a salt-adapted plant always grows faster at higher salinity.
- The optimum among tested treatments is 5 g dm^-3; an untested intermediate could perform better.
- A 14-day growth endpoint measures one life stage and response, not survival and reproduction throughout the natural habitat.
Common mistake: A zero dry-mass gain is not evidence that every seedling died, and four treatments cannot locate an exact threshold.
Marking points
- 5 g dm^-3 gives the greatest tested mean gain, 1.2 g.
- Growth is lower at both 0 and 10 g dm^-3 and no mean dry-mass gain occurs at 20 g dm^-3.
- Zero growth does not by itself demonstrate death or establish the precise upper tolerance boundary.
- Natural distribution also depends on other abiotic factors, biotic interactions and/or dispersal; one short seedling trial is insufficient.
Examiner tip: A zero dry-mass gain is not evidence that every seedling died, and four treatments cannot locate an exact threshold.
- 4.
Consider a hypothetical reef-building coral with photosynthetic symbionts. For this exercise, sustained growth requires temperature 23-29 degrees C, salinity 32-37 g kg^-1 and at least 15% of surface light. Site A has 26 degrees C, 35 g kg^-1 and 25% light; B has 27 degrees C, 34 g kg^-1 and 5% light; C has 31 degrees C, 35 g kg^-1 and 30% light. Identify which site passes all supplied requirements, explain the constraint at each other site, and explain why passing these three conditions does not guarantee a reef will form. These ranges are invented for this organism, not universal coral limits.
[4 marks] · no calculatorSyllabus placement evidence: Biology guide, first assessment 2025, B4.1.5 Conditions required for coral reef formation; B4.1.3 Abiotic variables affecting species distribution. Applies B4.1.3 and B4.1.5 on abiotic tolerance and reef conditions through supplied organism-specific thresholds. Selected SL written practice, not field identification, universal coral thresholds, evidence of reef formation or complete statement-level coverage.
Worked explanation
- Test each site's three values against the supplied intervals rather than ranking sites by one favourable measurement. B fails the light threshold and C fails the temperature ceiling.
- Coral growth depends on interacting conditions and persistence through time. The table screens possible habitat suitability for one hypothetical organism; it neither predicts community establishment nor establishes universal thresholds.
Common mistake: Meeting a temperature range alone does not establish a suitable habitat, and the invented thresholds must not be reported as universal coral requirements.
Marking points
- Only A meets all three stated requirements.
- B has insufficient light, potentially limiting symbiont photosynthesis despite suitable temperature and salinity.
- C exceeds the stated temperature tolerance; abundant light cannot compensate for failure of that requirement.
- Other conditions such as suitable substrate, pH, water clarity over time, recruitment and disturbance remain untested, so necessary conditions are not sufficient evidence of reef formation.
Examiner tip: Meeting a temperature range alone does not establish a suitable habitat, and the invented thresholds must not be reported as universal coral requirements.
- 5.
In a hypothetical dune transect, ten equal quadrats at each of soil pH 5, 6 and 7 contain a target grass in 2, 8 and 5 quadrats respectively. Sampling effort is equal and identification is assumed correct. Calculate percentage occupancy at each pH and identify the highest observed association. Explain why absence from a quadrat is not proof of physiological intolerance, and propose a design change that would help distinguish a pH effect from position along the dune. No fieldwork has been performed here.
[4 marks]Syllabus placement evidence: Biology guide, first assessment 2025, B4.1.3 Abiotic variables affecting species distribution; B4.1.4 Range of tolerance of a limiting factor, application of skills: transect data. Analyses supplied transect occupancy and abiotic association at SL under B4.1.3-B4.1.4. Written data interpretation does not fulfil the requirement to collect actual transect data in a natural or semi-natural habitat, nor certify complete statement-level coverage.
Worked explanation
- Occupancy counts quadrats containing the species, not individual abundance: divide each count by ten and multiply by 100.
- A field association combines physiological tolerance with access, interactions and detection. Replication across locations with recorded covariates helps test whether the pH pattern persists; it does not automatically establish a causal pH response.
Common mistake: Eighty percent occupied quadrats is not eighty percent of all individual plants, nor proof of an exact pH optimum.
Marking points
- Occupancies are 20%, 80% and 50% for pH 5, 6 and 7 respectively.
- Highest observed occupancy is at pH 6, not proof that the exact physiological optimum is 6.
- Absence may reflect limited dispersal, competition or missed plants rather than inability to tolerate that pH.
- Repeat independently placed transects or sample matched pH values across positions while recording moisture/exposure, reducing confounding between pH and dune location.
Examiner tip: Eighty percent occupied quadrats is not eighty percent of all individual plants, nor proof of an exact pH optimum.