School / IB / CHEMISTRY HL / Scientific investigation preparation Exam-style + marking analysis
Scientific investigation preparation Original written research-design and hypothetical data-analysis preparation, not a submitted investigation or completed practical.
Start questions AI-assisted content review; independent teacher approval pending.
Practice scope and review Unofficial content under accuracy, provenance, and rights review. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. Official past-paper questions are not reproduced here.
Preparation exercises These written exercises develop planning, analysis and evaluation skills. They do not replace supervised practical work, a completed investigation, whole-work study, authentic listening or live speaking assessment.
Choose practice topic Reactivity 1: entropy and spontaneity (HL) (15) Reactivity 2: acid-base equilibria (HL) (15) Reactivity 3: electron transfer (HL) (15) Structure 2: advanced bonding (HL) (18) Structure 3: transition metals (HL) (17) Scientific investigation preparation (10) Collaborative sciences project preparation (5)
All topics Chemistry HL Scientific investigation preparation
Choose a question to begin
10 original questions · 0 derived marking activities. Teaching explanations are AI-authored; independent teacher review is pending.
Practice diagnosis English AI checks 100% 10/10 activities
Practice diagnosis Start with a short attempt, then self-mark Open one question, write your working, then reveal the marking points. A clearer recommendation appears after you self-mark a few questions.
0% completion Not started self-marked accuracy Ready when you are self-marked progress
Search questions
Resume practice More filters View All Incomplete Complete One at a time
Revision Ladder All stages Standard Challenge
10 of 10 activities match
Question 1Plan an initial-rate investigation of the order with respect to A for an aqueous reaction A + B -> products. Concentrations quoted are initial concentrations after mixing. Give a suitable series of three A concentrations, explain how to keep B concentration and total mixed volume fixed while changing A, and state how the measured initial rates could determine the order in A. Keep temperature fixed. AI checked Challenge 3 marks No calculator +
Question 2Hypothetical rate constants for the same reaction are 0.0100 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 at 300 K and 0.0200 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 at 310 K. Assume Arrhenius behaviour with constant A across this interval. Using ln(k2/k1) = Ea/R (1/T1 - 1/T2) and R = 8.314 J mol^-1 K − 1 K^{-1} K − 1 , calculate Ea in kJ/mol. Explain why two points cannot establish that this model holds over a wide temperature range. AI checked Challenge 3 marks Calculator +
Question 3A hypothetical dilution uses a 10.00 +/-0.02 cm^3 pipette and a 100.0 +/-0.1 cm^3 volumetric flask. Stock concentration uncertainty is negligible. Under a conservative additive relative-uncertainty rule, calculate the percentage uncertainty in diluted concentration. Then predict the direction of concentration bias if the flask is filled above the mark, and propose a prevention step. AI checked Standard 3 marks Calculator +
Question 4For written HL investigation preparation, assume rate=k[A][B] with k=0.50 dm^3 mol^-1 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 . The reaction consumes A and B in a 1:1 ratio. Initially [A]=0.010 mol dm^-3 and [B]=0.200 mol dm^-3 at constant volume and temperature. Calculate the initial rate and k_obs in the approximation rate=k_obs[A]. If A becomes 0.002 mol dm^-3, calculate B and the resulting k_obs, and evaluate whether the original constant-k_obs approximation is exact. AI checked Challenge 5 marks Calculator +
Question 5A hypothetical fast-reaction investigation uses a sensor whose displayed signal after a sudden constant true signal S is S_display(t)=S(1-exp(-t/2.0)), with t in seconds. Treat this as a supplied response model, not a reaction law. Calculate the displayed fraction at t=1.0 s and the time to reach 95% of S. Explain why comparing first-second slopes from this sensor may misrepresent reactions with different fast time courses, and propose a targeted improvement. AI checked Challenge 4 marks Calculator +
Question 6In written HL investigation preparation, hypothetical first-order rate constants are fitted as y=20.0-6000x, where y=ln(k/(1 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 )) and x=1/T in K − 1 K^{-1} K − 1 . Use ln(k/(1 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 ))=ln(A/(1 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 ))-Ea/(RT), with R=8.314 J mol^-1 K − 1 K^{-1} K − 1 . Identify the slope and intercept, calculate Ea in kJ mol^-1 and A with units, and predict k at 300 K. The fit was obtained at only two distinct temperatures: explain one additional measurement strategy needed before treating the relation as valid over a wider temperature range. AI checked Challenge 5 marks Calculator +
Question 7In hypothetical initial-rate trials at one temperature, concentrations are quoted after mixing and rates are in mol dm^-3 s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 . Trial 1: [A]=0.0100, [B]=0.0200, rate=4.00 x 10 − 5 10^{-5} 1 0 − 5 . Trial 2: [A]=0.0200, [B]=0.0200, rate=1.60 x 10 − 4 10^{-4} 1 0 − 4 . Trial 3: [A]=0.0100, [B]=0.0400, rate=8.00 x 10 − 5 10^{-5} 1 0 − 5 . Concentrations have units mol dm^-3. Assume rate=k[A]^m[B]^n over this range. Deduce m and n with evidence, give the rate equation and overall order, calculate k with units, and predict the initial rate for [A]=0.0300 and [B]=0.0100 at the same temperature. This is written investigation analysis, not actual measured data. AI checked Challenge 5 marks Calculator +
Question 8A hypothetical investigation establishes rate=k_obs[A][B]^2 for overall A+2B -> P. Candidate mechanism M has A+B <=> I (fast pre-equilibrium), then I+B -> P (slow). For this task use [I]=K[A][B] and rate_slow=k2[I][B]. Candidate N has A+B -> I (slow), then I+B -> P (fast), and its slow-step rate is k1[A][B]. Sum the steps for M, identify its intermediate, derive its predicted rate equation, and decide which candidate is consistent with the measured law. Explain why consistency does not prove M uniquely correct. Treat A, B, I and P as abstract species with the stated stoichiometry. AI checked Challenge 5 marks No calculator +
Question 9For written investigation analysis, an ideal-gas mixture undergoes A(g)+B(g) <=> C(g)+D(g) at constant temperature and volume. Kc=9.00 in the concentration convention used here. Initially [A]=[B]=0.600 mol dm^-3 and [C]=[D]=0.200 mol dm^-3. Calculate the initial reaction quotient Qc and predict the net direction. Let x mol dm^-3 react in that direction: write all four equilibrium concentrations, solve for x and give the equilibrium composition. Take the positive square root of Kc to avoid expanding a quadratic. Explain why initial concentrations must not simply be inserted as equilibrium concentrations. AI checked Challenge 5 marks Calculator +
Question 10For hypothetical written spectroscopy preparation, the short-wavelength convergence limit of the hydrogen series ending at n=1 is measured as 91.2 nm. Use E=hc/lambda, h=6.626 x 10 − 34 10^{-34} 1 0 − 34 J s, c=2.998 x 10 8 10^{8} 1 0 8 m s − 1 s^{-1} s − 1 and NA=6.022 x 10 23 10^{23} 1 0 23 mol^-1. Convert the wavelength to metres, calculate the corresponding photon energy and first ionisation energy in kJ mol^-1, and explain why this limit rather than any one finite transition gives the ground-state ionisation threshold. Propose one specific instrumental check before trusting the inferred value. AI checked Challenge 5 marks Calculator +
Self-assessed Self-mark your first attempt
Set total 43
This is a self-study tool, not official marking or a predicted IB grade.
Session report Session report Priority: finish the attempt Complete more questions and self-mark them to get a sharper diagnosis.
Marked activities 0/10
Self-marked accuracy Not started
Self-marked progress Ready when you are Progress is saved on this device. Sign in to sync across devices. Reset progress
Timed practice on this topic What do you need help with? No payment now. Requests are reviewed; personal tutor matching is currently for adults only.
Specific topic Select a topic Initial-rate designs with controlled composition Activation-energy analysis from two temperatures Volumetric bias and dilution uncertainty Pseudo-first-order kinetics and excess-reagent assumptions Instrument response time and initial-rate comparisons Arrhenius plot intercepts and the pre-exponential factor Inferring a rate equation from initial-rate data Testing multistep mechanisms against kinetic evidence Reaction quotients and equilibrium composition Ionisation energy from spectral convergence Another topic