School / IB / PSYCH HL / Health psychology (option, HL) Exam-style + marking analysis
Health psychology (option, HL) Stress, coping, health promotion and substance abuse, examined on Paper 2 at HL depth.
Psychology HL Health psychology (option, HL)
Content review 0% 0/30 activities
Practice diagnosis Start with a short attempt, then self-mark Open one question, write your working, then reveal the marking points. A clearer recommendation appears after you self-mark a few questions.
0% completion 0% accuracy 0% mastery
View All Incomplete Complete One at a time
Revision Ladder All stages Easy Medium HardSoon
Paper All papers Paper 2 style General practice (not paper-specific)
Paper labels are an unofficial, independently authored grouping, applied only where a question's own format genuinely matches a real paper convention (such as IB Mathematics AA's non-calculator/calculator split). They do not reproduce any exam board's real paper numbering or mark allocation, and uncertain questions are labelled general practice instead.
1 Outline Selye's General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) model of the stress response, naming its three stages. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 2 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Outline Selye's General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) model of the stress response, naming its three stages.” Their response addresses only this point: “Names and outlines the alarm stage: the body's immediate fight-or-flight response to a stressor, involving a rapid surge of adrenaline.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 3 Distinguish between a major life event and a daily hassle as sources of stress, and explain why daily hassles may have a greater cumulative impact on health than infrequent major life events. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 4 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Distinguish between a major life event and a daily hassle as sources of stress, and explain why daily hassles may have a greater cumulative impact on health than infrequent major life events.” Their response addresses only this point: “Defines a major life event as a significant, discrete change requiring substantial readjustment (e.g., divorce, job loss), which is relatively infrequent.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 5 Holmes and Rahe developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), which assigns a numerical value to different life events based on the amount of readjustment they require, and sums these values to predict stress-related illness risk. State one strength and one limitation of this approach to measuring stress. Paper 2 style Easy 2 marks No calculator + 6 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Holmes and Rahe developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), which assigns a numerical value to different life events based on the amount of readjustment they require, and sums these values to predict stress-related illness risk. State one strength and one limitation of this approach to measuring stress.” Their response addresses only this point: “States a valid strength, such as the SRRS providing a standardized, quantifiable measure of stress exposure that allows researchers to compare stress levels across individuals and studies.” Evaluate the response against the complete 2-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 2 marks No calculator + 7 Distinguish between problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, giving one example of each, and suggest one factor that might determine which strategy a person uses. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 8 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Distinguish between problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, giving one example of each, and suggest one factor that might determine which strategy a person uses.” Their response addresses only this point: “Defines problem-focused coping as directly addressing the source of the stressor to remove or reduce it. Gives a valid example, such as creating a study schedule to manage exam stress.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 9 Explain how social support can act as a buffer against the negative health effects of stress. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 10 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Explain how social support can act as a buffer against the negative health effects of stress.” Their response addresses only this point: “Explains that social support can provide practical assistance (e.g., help solving the problem causing stress) and emotional reassurance, both of which can reduce the perceived severity of a stressor.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 11 Using the theory of planned behaviour, explain why simply providing information about the health risks of smoking is often insufficient to change smoking behaviour. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 12 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Using the theory of planned behaviour, explain why simply providing information about the health risks of smoking is often insufficient to change smoking behaviour.” Their response addresses only this point: “Outlines the theory of planned behaviour: behaviour is predicted by behavioural intention, which is itself shaped by three factors: attitude toward the behaviour, subjective norms (perceived social pressure), and perceived behavioural control.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 13 Explain how 'unrealistic optimism' (the belief that one is personally less likely than others to experience a negative health outcome) can act as a barrier to engaging in preventative health behaviour. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 14 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Explain how 'unrealistic optimism' (the belief that one is personally less likely than others to experience a negative health outcome) can act as a barrier to engaging in preventative health behaviour.” Their response addresses only this point: “Defines unrealistic optimism as a cognitive bias in which individuals believe they are less at risk of a negative health outcome (e.g., lung cancer, heart disease) than the average person, even when their actual risk factors (e.g., smoking) are comparable or higher.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 15 Explain both a biological and a sociocultural factor that could contribute to the development of obesity, and explain why treating obesity as purely a matter of individual willpower oversimplifies its causes. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 16 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Explain both a biological and a sociocultural factor that could contribute to the development of obesity, and explain why treating obesity as purely a matter of individual willpower oversimplifies its causes.” Their response addresses only this point: “Explains a valid biological factor, such as genetic variation affecting metabolic rate, appetite regulation, or fat storage, which can make some individuals more biologically predisposed to weight gain than others under identical diets.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 17 Explain how positive outcome expectancies can contribute to the development of substance use. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 18 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Explain how positive outcome expectancies can contribute to the development of substance use.” Their response addresses only this point: “Defines outcome expectancies as beliefs about the likely effects of using a substance.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 19 Explain how peer influence and social norms can promote substance use among adolescents. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 20 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Explain how peer influence and social norms can promote substance use among adolescents.” Their response addresses only this point: “Explains that adolescents may imitate friends who use substances (social learning), especially if use is rewarded with approval.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 21 Outline the main components of the Health Belief Model and apply them to a person deciding whether to have an annual flu vaccination. Paper 2 style Medium 4 marks No calculator + 22 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Outline the main components of the Health Belief Model and apply them to a person deciding whether to have an annual flu vaccination.” Their response addresses only this point: “Outlines perceived susceptibility and severity: believing one could catch flu and that it would be serious.” Evaluate the response against the complete 4-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Medium 4 marks No calculator + 23 Evaluate the effectiveness of graphic warning labels on cigarette packets as a health promotion strategy. Paper 2 style Medium 4 marks No calculator + 24 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Evaluate the effectiveness of graphic warning labels on cigarette packets as a health promotion strategy.” Their response addresses only this point: “Explains how graphic warnings aim to increase perceived severity and fear, motivating quitting.” Evaluate the response against the complete 4-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Medium 4 marks No calculator + 25 Distinguish between a risk factor and a protective factor in health behaviour, giving one example of each. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 26 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Distinguish between a risk factor and a protective factor in health behaviour, giving one example of each.” Their response addresses only this point: “States that a risk factor increases the likelihood of poor health outcomes, e.g. chronic stress or a family history of addiction.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 27 Using Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model, explain why two people can experience the same event with different levels of stress. Paper 2 style Easy 3 marks No calculator + 28 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “Using Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model, explain why two people can experience the same event with different levels of stress.” Their response addresses only this point: “Explains primary appraisal: each person judges whether the event is irrelevant, benign or a threat/challenge.” Evaluate the response against the complete 3-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 3 marks No calculator + 29 State one strength and one limitation of using a longitudinal design to investigate the link between stress and illness. Paper 2 style Easy 2 marks No calculator + 30 Marking analysis: A learner attempts the following task: “State one strength and one limitation of using a longitudinal design to investigate the link between stress and illness.” Their response addresses only this point: “States a strength such as following the same people over time, allowing researchers to see whether stress precedes illness.” Evaluate the response against the complete 2-mark task. Identify what earns credit and state every additional requirement needed for full marks. Marking analysis Easy 2 marks No calculator + Self-assessed 0 / 0
Set total 90
This is a self-study tool, not official marking or a predicted IB grade.
Session report Priority: finish the attempt Complete more questions and self-mark them to get a sharper diagnosis.
Marked activities 0/30
Accuracy 0%
Mastery 0% Progress is saved on this device. Sign in to sync across devices. Reset progress
Before you practise
Questions learners ask about this practice Are these official IB questions? No. These are original SubjectScout practice questions for Health psychology (option, HL). They are not official past-paper questions or endorsed material.
What does this Psychology HL practice page include? It includes selected topic questions, marking points, and feedback prompts designed to help learners practise before requesting teacher support.
Can I request a teacher for this exact topic? Yes. Tell SubjectScout the subject, exact topic, level and deadline, and the team will try to match you with a suitable verified teacher.
Unofficial content under accuracy, provenance, and rights review. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. Official past-paper questions are not reproduced here.