Question 1In a fictional economy, municipal laundry services may be privatised. Hospital-laundry bidder Aster would employ 50 operatives working 160 paid hours monthly. A proposed wage floor rises from $10 to $11 per hour, and the policy rate rises by 2 percentage points. Assume all operatives currently earn the old floor, hours stay unchanged and Aster has $400000 floating-rate debt repriced one-for-one. A training grant may support productivity but is not guaranteed. (a) Calculate the extra monthly wage bill and annual interest under these assumptions. (b) Evaluate privatisation against continued public ownership from Aster's and service users' perspectives, including competition and service accountability. (c) Explain how wage regulation, monetary tightening, a possible grant and fiscal demand changes affect the tender decision. Recommend a response without predicting actual laws or a certain demand effect.5 indicative marks
In a fictional economy, municipal laundry services may be privatised. Hospital-laundry bidder Aster would employ 50 operatives working 160 paid hours monthly. A proposed wage floor rises from $10 to $11 per hour, and the policy rate rises by 2 percentage points. Assume all operatives currently earn the old floor, hours stay unchanged and Aster has $400000 floating-rate debt repriced one-for-one. A training grant may support productivity but is not guaranteed. (a) Calculate the extra monthly wage bill and annual interest under these assumptions. (b) Evaluate privatisation against continued public ownership from Aster's and service users' perspectives, including competition and service accountability. (c) Explain how wage regulation, monetary tightening, a possible grant and fiscal demand changes affect the tender decision. Recommend a response without predicting actual laws or a certain demand effect.
Cambridge 2027: Direct conceptual match
Political, legal and economic exposure: the case explicitly requires each mapped concept and its application, analysis and conditional evaluation. 9609 6.1.1/6.1.2: checked wages8000/month, interest8000/year and annual combined104000; public/private ownership trade-offs and distinct regulatory, monetary and fiscal mechanisms are applied, not forecast as real policy. Conceptual evidence only; independent teacher placement review pending.
- 9609: 6.1.1: Political and legal context
- 9609: 6.1.2: Economic context
AI-assisted placement. Independent teacher approval pending.
Show indicative guidance
Worked guidance
- Calculate 50*160*(11-10)=$8000 monthly extra wages and 400000*0.02=$8000 annual extra interest. On an annual basis these two increases total $104000 before any other changes, rather than $16000.
- Compare ownership arrangements in this hospital context: reliability and hygiene failures can harm users even if a low bid saves money. Aster might gain a market through privatisation, but competitive tendering, enforcement and capital obligations determine whether the opportunity is attractive.
- Monetary tightening, fiscal purchasing and a training subsidy operate through different channels and can offset one another. Recommend bidding only if costed service obligations and downside cash forecasts are viable without an unconfirmed grant. A reasoned decision not to bid is acceptable; no statement here is advice about a real country's wage or procurement law.
Self-marking points
View marking points
- The monthly wage increase is $8000; the incremental annual interest is $8000, and the different time bases must not be added without conversion.
- Private ownership can bring investment and efficiency incentives but may prioritise profitable contracts or weaken access unless specifications and monitoring protect service.
- Public ownership may support service continuity but can face budget and incentive constraints; ownership alone does not determine quality.
- The wage floor is a stipulated legal constraint; higher rates can raise Aster's finance cost and restrain customer spending, while grants and government purchasing can support activity.
- A conditional bid should price compliance, cash buffers and service requirements, and treat the grant as contingent; demand, competitive tender terms and productivity evidence remain missing.
Examiner tip
Convert monthly and annual effects to the same basis, and distinguish a fictional policy scenario from an assertion about actual law. Alternative judgements are acceptable when reasoned from the case, with assumptions and limitations explicit. Indicative marking only; independent teacher approval pending.